{"id":4107,"date":"2011-03-12T21:31:38","date_gmt":"2011-03-12T21:31:38","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/etbscreenwriting.com\/\/?p=4107"},"modified":"2011-03-12T21:31:38","modified_gmt":"2011-03-12T21:31:38","slug":"the-woman-in-the-window-day-three-40movies40days","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/etbscreenwriting.com\/the-woman-in-the-window-day-three-40movies40days\/","title":{"rendered":"The Woman in the Window – Day Three – #40movies40days"},"content":{"rendered":"

\"fritz_lang\"<\/a>I selected this Fritz Lang psychological thriller because I hadn’t seen it, I admire Lang as a director and it starred Edward G. Robinson (who rarely disappoints). \u00a0And it was available as a “watch instantly” selection on NetFlix. \u00a0Again, a somewhat random choice.<\/p>\n

The Woman in the Window<\/em> tells the story of Richard Wanley (Edward G. Robinson) whose beloved wife leaves with the children for a long summer holiday in Maine. \u00a0On the way to have a drink at his club, Wanley sees the portrait of a beautiful woman in a gallery window. \u00a0His friends arrive to meet him and they too remark on the portrait as their “dream girl.”<\/p>\n

One of Wanley’s friends at the club is District Attorney Frank Laylor (Raymond Massey). \u00a0The men bemoan the lack of adventure in their lives. \u00a0Laylor muses about middle-aged men kicking up their heels and speaks of his experience as a prosecutor:\u00a0\u00a0“Trouble often starts from little things,” \u00a0he says. “Genuine actual tragedy issues directly out of pure carelessness or the merest trifle. \u00a0It results from the casual impulse, the idle \u00a0flirtation or just one drink too many.”<\/p>\n

\"woman-in-the-window-title-still\"<\/a>And of course that’s exactly what happens. \u00a0As Wanley leaves the club, just a little tipsy, he stops to admire the portrait once again and sees the actual woman’s face in the window. \u00a0He is surprised and turns to find she is very real. \u00a0The woman occasionally stops by to look at the painting herself (and it amuses her to see the reaction on men’s faces as they admire it.)<\/p>\n

She flirts. \u00a0Wanley buys her a drink. \u00a0They end up in her apartment, where she has a portfolio of other portraits of her by the same artist. \u00a0Her jealous boyfriend bursts in and, in a struggle, Wanley kills the intruder by stabbing him in the back with a scissors. \u00a0Wanley and the woman discuss calling the police and then decide to cover up the crime instead. \u00a0 Guilt, blackmail and a tightening noose of suspicion ensue.<\/p>\n

Unfortunately an unsatisfying ending was forced on the film by the Hays Office morality code. \u00a0It’s a cheat and the easy way out. \u00a0In a strange way I suppose it is emblematic of the “easy way out” that ruins Wanley’s character. \u00a0Despite this fault, the film is an interesting early version of American film noir.<\/p>\n

According to Wikipedia: \u00a0(The Woman in the Window<\/em> is) based on J. H. Wallis’ novel Once Off Guard. <\/em>The story features two surprise twists at the end. Scriptwriter Nunnally Johnson founded International Pictures (his own independent production company) after writing successful films such as The Grapes of Wrath<\/em> (1940) and other John Ford films. \u00a0(His partner was William Goetz.) \u00a0Johnson chose The Woman in the Window<\/em> as the production company’s premiere project.”<\/p>\n

\"nunnally\"<\/a>Johnson had an incredibly prolific career and was nominated for the Academy Award for Best Screenplay in 1940 for The Grapes of Wrath<\/em> and for the Directors Guild of America Best Directors Award in 1956 for The Man in the Gray Flannel Suit. <\/em>He also wrote How to Marry a Millionaire<\/em>, The Gunfighter<\/em>,\u00a0My Cousin Rachel<\/em>, The Three Faces of Eve<\/em> and The Dirty Dozen. <\/em>He wrote over 60 films over the course of his career. \u00a0That works out to a least one film a year every year from 1933 until 1967 (and often two or three films in a year).<\/p>\n

A couple of things struck me about this film. \u00a0First of all, by \u00a0silly co-incidence, the book Wanley takes down from the library shelf to read in his club is The Song of Solomon<\/em>. \u00a0That poem happens to figure prominently in a project I am working on right now. \u00a0I love those odd and slightly thrilling little “signs” that occasionally pop up as you are nursing a project along, don’t you?<\/p>\n

The second thing that struck me is the issue of integrity. Wanley is a good a man. \u00a0He has loving family whom he adores. \u00a0He is a well-regarded professor and a generally decent guy. \u00a0He is foolish enough to follow a beautiful charming woman to her apartment. \u00a0Although he has no intention of sleeping with her, he is a bit vain and allows himself to be flattered by her attention. \u00a0He is surprised by the jealous lover and clearly kills him in self-defense.<\/p>\n

If Wanley had called the police, he would have found himself in the center of a scandal. \u00a0He would have been embarrassed and humiliated in front of his wife and perhaps might even have lost his job at the college. \u00a0But his dilemma is one caused by simple human male stupidity. \u00a0The matter becomes criminal when he doesn’t report the death, dumps the body and lies to the police. \u00a0He then plots a second murder to cover up the first. \u00a0The simple act of picking up the phone and then putting it down strips him of his first bit of integrity.<\/p>\n

Evil always starts with a small thing– stupid carelessness, hurtful blurted words, a harmless flirtation, a bit too much to drink, an unchecked impulse. \u00a0This quote by Edward Tufte says it all– “Evil does not have horns or breathe fire or call explosive attention to itself. \u00a0It is a force (or a fear) that slowly and imperceptibly erodes our standards, clouds our judgements, lulls (or paralyzes) us into submission and, before we realize it, has lead us down a regrettable path from which there is no return.”<\/p>\n

We lose our integrity bit by bit, decision by decision, one small choice at a time. \u00a0Thoughts (or fears) create action. Action creates habits. Habits build (or destroy) Character. Character creates Destiny. \u00a0That’s part of the larger question I am looking at for myself. \u00a0Just how do I want to direct my own destiny? What new choices need to be made? \u00a0What new habits created?<\/p>\n

Here’s the first nine minutes of the film–<\/p>\n